[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aAij2oUCP1zmcoPv@stanley.mountain>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:24:58 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@...com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@...com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@...il.com>,
Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH next] mm/mempolicy: Fix error code in sysfs_wi_node_add()
Return -EEXIST if the node already exists. Don't return success.
Fixes: 1bf270ac1b0a ("mm/mempolicy: support memory hotplug in weighted interleave")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
---
Potentially returning success was intentional? This is from static
analysis and I can't be totally sure.
mm/mempolicy.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index f43951668c41..0538a994440a 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -3539,7 +3539,7 @@ static const struct kobj_type wi_ktype = {
static int sysfs_wi_node_add(int nid)
{
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;
char *name;
struct iw_node_attr *new_attr;
@@ -3569,6 +3569,7 @@ static int sysfs_wi_node_add(int nid)
if (wi_group->nattrs[nid]) {
mutex_unlock(&wi_group->kobj_lock);
pr_info("node%d already exists\n", nid);
+ ret = -EEXIST;
goto out;
}
--
2.47.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists