[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250423122301-64a5773d-a3cf-4e21-9f24-04294ca4eeb0@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 12:24:04 +0200
From: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
To: Dawid Osuchowski <dawid.osuchowski@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] net: Don't use %pK
through printk
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 03:39:13PM +0200, Dawid Osuchowski wrote:
> On 2025-04-17 3:24 PM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > acquire sleeping looks in atomic contexts.
>
> typo? s/sleeping looks/sleeping locks/
>
> present in patch descriptions as well
Thanks for noticing. I fixed it up in my template now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists