lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aAokixHVo5YjazmL@google.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 11:46:19 +0000
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@...gle.com>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] rust: alloc: add Vec::retain

On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 02:14:11PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On 4/22/25 11:52 AM, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> > Unfortunately this can't be a kunit test because it uses the upstream
> > Rust implementation of Vec::retain as a comparison, which we can't call
> > from a kunit test.
> 
> Would it work from the rusttest target? We can use our kernel Vec type from
> there, but I don't remember if we still can use std Vec from there.

My guess is no, but I don't know for sure.

Alice

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ