[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250424134104.18031a70@donnerap.manchester.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 13:41:04 +0100
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof
Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu
Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, Samuel
Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Andrew
Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] arm64: dts: allwinner: a527: add EMAC0 to Radxa A5E
board
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 14:16:16 +0200
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 01:42:41AM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:58:37 +0200
> > Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > > +&emac0 {
> > > > + phy-mode = "rgmii";
> > >
> > > Does the PCB have extra long clock lines in order to provide the
> > > needed 2ns delay? I guess not, so this should be rgmii-id.
> >
> > That's a good point, and it probably true.
> >
> > >
> > > > + phy-handle = <&ext_rgmii_phy>;
> > > > +
> > > > + allwinner,tx-delay-ps = <300>;
> > > > + allwinner,rx-delay-ps = <400>;
> > >
> > > These are rather low delays, since the standard requires 2ns. Anyway,
> > > once you change phy-mode, you probably don't need these.
> >
> > Those go on top of the main 2ns delay
>
> Which 2ns delay? "rgmii" means don't add 2ns delay, the PCB is doing
> it. So if there is a 2ns delay, something is broken by not respecting
> "rgmii".
>
> > I just tried, it also works with some variations of those values, but
> > setting tx-delay to 0 stops communication.
>
> Just to be clear, you tried it with "rgmii-id" and the same <300> and
> <400> values?
Yes, sorry, I wasn't clear: I used rgmii-id, then experimented with those
values. I briefly tried "rgmii", and I couldn't get a lease, so I quite
confident it's rgmii-id, as you said. The vendor DTs just use "rgmii", but
they might hack the delay up another way (and I cannot be asked to look at
that awful code).
Cheers,
Andre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists