[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aAozSky7pIIGIB4s@krava>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 14:49:14 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH perf/core 10/22] uprobes/x86: Add support to optimize
uprobes
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 05:04:03PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
SNIP
> > arch/x86/include/asm/uprobes.h | 7 +
> > arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 281 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > include/linux/uprobes.h | 6 +-
> > kernel/events/uprobes.c | 15 +-
> > 4 files changed, 301 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
>
> just minor nits, LGTM
>
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
>
> > +int set_swbp(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > + unsigned long vaddr)
> > +{
> > + if (should_optimize(auprobe)) {
> > + bool optimized = false;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * We could race with another thread that already optimized the probe,
> > + * so let's not overwrite it with int3 again in this case.
> > + */
> > + err = is_optimized(vma->vm_mm, vaddr, &optimized);
> > + if (err || optimized)
> > + return err;
>
> IMO, this is a bit too clever, I'd go with plain
>
> if (err)
> return err;
> if (optimized)
> return 0; /* we are done */
>
ok
> (and mirror set_orig_insn() structure, consistently)
set_orig_insn does that already, right?
>
>
> > + }
> > + return uprobe_write_opcode(vma, vaddr, UPROBE_SWBP_INSN, true);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int set_orig_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > + unsigned long vaddr)
> > +{
> > + if (test_bit(ARCH_UPROBE_FLAG_CAN_OPTIMIZE, &auprobe->flags)) {
> > + struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> > + bool optimized = false;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + err = is_optimized(mm, vaddr, &optimized);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > + if (optimized)
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(swbp_unoptimize(auprobe, vma, vaddr));
> > + }
> > + return uprobe_write_opcode(vma, vaddr, *(uprobe_opcode_t *)&auprobe->insn, false);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __arch_uprobe_optimize(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr)
> > +{
> > + struct uprobe_trampoline *tramp;
> > + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> > + int err = 0;
> > +
> > + vma = find_vma(mm, vaddr);
> > + if (!vma)
> > + return -1;
>
> this is EPERM, will be confusing to debug... why not -EINVAL?
>
> > + tramp = uprobe_trampoline_get(vaddr);
> > + if (!tramp)
> > + return -1;
>
> ditto
so the error value is not exposed to user space in this case,
we try to optimize in the first hit with:
handle_swbp()
{
arch_uprobe_optimize()
{
if (__arch_uprobe_optimize(mm, vaddr))
set_bit(ARCH_UPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZE_FAIL, &auprobe->flags);
}
}
and set ARCH_UPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZE_FAIL flags bit in case of error,
plus there's WARN for swbp_optimize which should pass in case we
get that far
thanks,
jirka
>
> > + err = swbp_optimize(vma, vaddr, tramp->vaddr);
> > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(err))
> > + uprobe_trampoline_put(tramp);
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +
>
> [...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists