[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aAo1UxB0VqJLbPtz@x1>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:57:55 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf tool_pmu: Fix aggregation on duration_time
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 09:58:38AM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/tool_pmu.c
> > @@ -486,8 +486,14 @@ int evsel__tool_pmu_read(struct evsel *evsel, int cpu_map_idx, int thread)
> > delta_start *= 1000000000 / ticks_per_sec;
> > }
> > count->val = delta_start;
> > - count->ena = count->run = delta_start;
> > count->lost = 0;
> > + /*
> > + * The values of enabled and running must make a ratio of 100%. The
> > + * exact values don't matter as long as they are non-zero to avoid
> > + * issues with evsel__count_has_error.
> > + */
> > + count->ena++;
> > + count->run++;
> > return 0;
> > }
> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next,
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists