[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <609c8b1a-d7a9-4667-bd6c-1455c639fcd0@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 15:24:17 +0200
From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
To: Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/nouveau: Check dma_fence in canonical way
On 4/24/25 3:02 PM, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> In nouveau_fence_done(), a fence is checked for being signaled by
> manually evaluating the base fence's bits. This can be done in a
> canonical manner through dma_fence_is_signaled().
>
> Replace the bit-check with dma_fence_is_signaled().
>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
> index fb9811938c82..d5654e26d5bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
> @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ nouveau_fence_done(struct nouveau_fence *fence)
> struct nouveau_channel *chan;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->base.flags))
> + if (dma_fence_is_signaled(&fence->base))
This is only correct with commit bbe5679f30d7 ("drm/nouveau: Fix WARN_ON in
nouveau_fence_context_kill()") from drm-misc-fixes, correct?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists