[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87msc5hc1a.fsf@bootlin.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 16:25:21 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Raju Rangoju <Raju.Rangoju@....com>
Cc: <broonie@...nel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Krishnamoorthi M
<krishnamoorthi.m@....com>, Akshata MukundShetty
<akshata.mukundshetty@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-mem: Add fix to avoid divide error
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c
> @@ -596,7 +596,11 @@ u64 spi_mem_calc_op_duration(struct spi_mem_op *op)
> ns_per_cycles = 1000000000 / op->max_freq;
> ncycles += ((op->cmd.nbytes * 8) / op->cmd.buswidth) / (op->cmd.dtr ? 2 : 1);
> ncycles += ((op->addr.nbytes * 8) / op->addr.buswidth) / (op->addr.dtr ? 2 : 1);
> - ncycles += ((op->dummy.nbytes * 8) / op->dummy.buswidth) / (op->dummy.dtr ? 2 : 1);
> +
> + /* Dummy bytes are optional for some SPI flash memory operations */
> + if (op->dummy.nbytes)
> + ncycles += ((op->dummy.nbytes * 8) / op->dummy.buswidth) / (op->dummy.dtr ? 2 : 1);
> +
> ncycles += ((op->data.nbytes * 8) / op->data.buswidth) / (op->data.dtr ? 2 : 1);
>
> return ncycles * ns_per_cycles;
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Actually even address bytes sometimes may be skipped (eg. status reads). But there is no
reason for using spi_mem_calc_op_duration() in this case.
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists