[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8909e6a6-4f3a-49a7-a3fe-f6ab9d925aaf@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 12:26:57 -0700
From: steven chen <chenste@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: zohar@...ux.ibm.com, stefanb@...ux.ibm.com,
roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com, roberto.sassu@...wei.com,
eric.snowberg@...cle.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, paul@...l-moore.com,
code@...icks.com, bauermann@...abnow.com, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com,
nramas@...ux.microsoft.com, James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com,
vgoyal@...hat.com, dyoung@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 0/9] ima: kexec: measure events between kexec load and
execute
On 4/24/2025 7:37 AM, Baoquan He wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> Could you test below code and post a formal patch to not copy
> measurement list buffer to kdump kernel? Below log is just for your
> reference, please feel free to modify or rephrase.
>
> ===
> Kdump kernel doesn't need IMA to do integrity measurement.
> Hence the measurement list in 1st kernel doesn't need to be copied to
> kdump kenrel.
>
> Here skip allocating buffer for measurement list copying if loading
> kdump kernel. Then there won't be the later handling related to
> ima_kexec_buffer.
> ===
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> index 38cb2500f4c3..7362f68f2d8b 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> @@ -146,6 +146,9 @@ void ima_add_kexec_buffer(struct kimage *image)
> void *kexec_buffer = NULL;
> int ret;
>
> + if (image->type == KEXEC_TYPE_CRASH)
> + return;
> +
> /*
> * Reserve extra memory for measurements added during kexec.
> */
Hi Baoquan,
I will work on it and I will post a patch after this patch set merged.
Thanks,
Steven
Powered by blists - more mailing lists