linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: ARM_DMA350 should depend on ARM/ARM64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <174547301700.316124.6778478265087224914.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 11:06:57 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, 
 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: ARM_DMA350 should depend on ARM/ARM64


On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 20:11:19 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> The Arm DMA-350 controller is only present on Arm-based SoCs.  Hence add
> dependencies on ARM and ARM64, to prevent asking the user about this
> driver when configuring a kernel for a non-Arm architecture.
> 
> 

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] dmaengine: ARM_DMA350 should depend on ARM/ARM64
      commit: 86071b369dbdf0a8f7e4424c4e0b613ba7b8ab5e

Best regards,
-- 
~Vinod