[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9f08de79-4550-4b85-ba36-9615a300e32a@de.bosch.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 07:47:23 +0200
From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...bosch.com>
To: Remo Senekowitsch <remo@...nzli.dev>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, "Andreas
Hindborg" <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, "Trevor
Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, "Greg
Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki"
<rafael@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] samples: rust: platform: Add property read
examples
On 23/04/2025 14:39, Dirk Behme wrote:
> Hi Remo,
>
> On 14/04/2025 17:26, Remo Senekowitsch wrote:
>> Add some example usage of the device property read methods for
>> DT/ACPI/swnode properties.
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Remo Senekowitsch <remo@...nzli.dev>
>> ---
>> drivers/of/unittest-data/tests-platform.dtsi | 3 +
>> samples/rust/rust_driver_platform.rs | 69 +++++++++++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/tests-platform.dtsi b/drivers/of/unittest-data/tests-platform.dtsi
>> index 4171f43cf..50a51f38a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/unittest-data/tests-platform.dtsi
>> +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/tests-platform.dtsi
>> @@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ dev@100 {
>> test-device@2 {
>> compatible = "test,rust-device";
>> reg = <0x2>;
>> +
>> + test,u32-prop = <0xdeadbeef>;
>> + test,i16-array = /bits/ 16 <1 2 (-3) (-4)>;
>
>
> Is "test,u32-required-prop" missing here? See below ...
Ah, no, sorry, "test,u32-required-prop" isn't there intentionally to
demonstrate the error handling on missing required properties. In this
case I would propose to just remove the '?' to make the sample code not
exit on this intended error:
diff --git a/samples/rust/rust_driver_platform.rs
b/samples/rust/rust_driver_platform.rs
index 01902956e1ca7..b6cbd721a8882 100644
--- a/samples/rust/rust_driver_platform.rs
+++ b/samples/rust/rust_driver_platform.rs
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ fn properties_parse(dev: &kernel::device::Device) ->
Result<()> {
// Missing property without a default will print an error
let _ = dev
.property_read::<u32>(c_str!("test,u32-required-prop"))
- .required()?;
+ .required();
let prop: u32 =
dev.property_read(c_str!("test,u32-prop")).required()?;
dev_info!(dev, "'test,u32-prop' is {:#x}\n", prop);
Best regards
Dirk
Powered by blists - more mailing lists