[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250424062910.6zk7amxq4gjxtw66@vireshk-i7>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 11:59:10 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...hat.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
Manos Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidianakis@...aro.org>,
Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>,
Joakim Bech <joakim.bech@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, Burak Emir <bqe@...gle.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 13/15] rust: cpufreq: Extend abstractions for driver
registration
On 23-04-25, 14:08, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On 4/21/25 9:22 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >
> > + /// Same as [`Registration::new`], but does not return a [`Registration`] instance.
> > + ///
> > + /// Instead the [`Registration`] is owned by [`Devres`] and will be revoked / dropped, once the
> > + /// device is detached.
> > + pub fn new_foreign_owned(dev: &Device) -> Result<()> {
> > + Devres::new_foreign_owned(dev, Self::new()?, GFP_KERNEL)
> > + }
>
> Btw. if you take it for v6.16-rc1, expect a conflict with [1].
>
> [1] https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/driver-core/driver-core.git/commit/?h=driver-core-next&id=f720efda2db5e609b32100c25d9cf383f082d945
Thanks for pointing this out. I believe this branch is immutable and
so I can rebase over f720efda and send my pull request after yours is
merged ?
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists