[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250424071545.GM48485@unreal>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 10:15:45 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Jake Edge <jake@....net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>,
Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@...sung.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 11/24] mm/hmm: provide generic DMA managing logic
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 02:28:56PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 11:13:02AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> >
> > HMM callers use PFN list to populate range while calling
> > to hmm_range_fault(), the conversion from PFN to DMA address
> > is done by the callers with help of another DMA list. However,
> > it is wasteful on any modern platform and by doing the right
> > logic, that DMA list can be avoided.
> >
> > Provide generic logic to manage these lists and gave an interface
> > to map/unmap PFNs to DMA addresses, without requiring from the callers
> > to be an experts in DMA core API.
> >
> > Tested-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
>
> I don't think Jens tested the RDMA and hmm parts :)
I know, but he posted his Tested-by tag on cover letter and b4 picked it
for whole series. I decided to keep it as is.
>
> > + /*
> > + * The HMM API violates our normal DMA buffer ownership rules and can't
> > + * transfer buffer ownership. The dma_addressing_limited() check is a
> > + * best approximation to ensure no swiotlb buffering happens.
> > + */
>
> This is a bit unclear, HMM inherently can't do cache flushing or
> swiotlb bounce buffering because its entire purpose is to DMA directly
> and coherently to a mm_struct's page tables. There are no sensible
> points we could put the required flushing that wouldn't break the
> entire model.
>
> FWIW I view that fact that we now fail back to userspace in these
> cases instead of quietly malfunction to be a big improvement.
>
> > +bool hmm_dma_unmap_pfn(struct device *dev, struct hmm_dma_map *map, size_t idx)
> > +{
> > + struct dma_iova_state *state = &map->state;
> > + dma_addr_t *dma_addrs = map->dma_list;
> > + unsigned long *pfns = map->pfn_list;
> > + unsigned long attrs = 0;
> > +
> > +#define HMM_PFN_VALID_DMA (HMM_PFN_VALID | HMM_PFN_DMA_MAPPED)
> > + if ((pfns[idx] & HMM_PFN_VALID_DMA) != HMM_PFN_VALID_DMA)
> > + return false;
> > +#undef HMM_PFN_VALID_DMA
>
> If a v10 comes I'd put this in a const function level variable:
>
> const unsigned int HMM_PFN_VALID_DMA = HMM_PFN_VALID | HMM_PFN_DMA_MAPPED;
>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
I have no idea if v10 is needed. DMA API is stable for a long time and
only DMA part should go in shared branch. Everything else will need to
go through relevant subsystems anyway.
Thanks
>
> Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists