lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250424081101.GA22989@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 10:11:01 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
	Mika Penttilä <mpenttil@...hat.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Jake Edge <jake@....net>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
	Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>,
	Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
	Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@...sung.com>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 10/24] mm/hmm: let users to tag specific PFN with
 DMA mapped bit

On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 11:07:44AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > I see, so yes order occupies 5 bits [-4,-5,-6,-7,-8] and the
> > DMA_MAPPED overlaps, it should be 9 not 7 because of the backwardness.
> 
> Thanks for the fix.

Maybe we can use the chance to make the scheme less fragile?  i.e.
put flags in the high bits and derive the first valid bit from the
pfn order?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ