linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM: TI: AM335x: PM STANDBY fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDyKFrM7Qn2YtQKY+vCHP32Z_Ly-ECt=SU9EGojFu1ShktUpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 12:04:08 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Sukrut Bellary <sbellary@...libre.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, 
	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>, Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>, 
	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>, Bajjuri Praneeth <praneeth@...com>, 
	Raghavendra Vignesh <vigneshr@...com>, Bin Liu <b-liu@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM: TI: AM335x: PM STANDBY fixes

On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 02:30, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com> wrote:
>
> Sukrut Bellary <sbellary@...libre.com> writes:
>
> > This patch series fixes the Power management issues on TI's am335x soc.
> >
> > on AM335x, the wakeup doesn't work in the case of STANDBY.
>
> This series is specifically targetted at the AM335x EVM (which I don't
> have to test), so I'd appreciate getting any test reports for this
> before I queue it up.
>
> For AM335x, I currently only have the ICEv2 and Beaglebone Black,
> neithor of which support suspend resume with RTC wake AFAICT.  If they
> do, please enlighten me. :)
>
> I was able to do a basic boot test on the 2 boards I have with this
> series applied on top of v6.15-rc1 and basic boot still works, but I was
> not able to test the PM path that's being changed here, so any tests on
> AM3 platforms that actually use this path are appreciated.
>
> Kevin

Is the pmdomain patch(3) ready to be applied here? Please let me know
if you want me to pick it up.

Kind regards
Uffe