lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8944b510-6d70-472c-99a2-52a60517733d@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 12:05:13 +0200
From: Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>
To: "Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
 xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
 dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, acme@...nel.org,
 andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, peterz@...radead.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
 mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
 irogers@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
 wei.liu@...nel.org, ajay.kaher@...adcom.com,
 bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
 pbonzini@...hat.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
 luto@...nel.org, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, kys@...rosoft.com,
 haiyangz@...rosoft.com, decui@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 12/34] x86/msr: Remove pmu_msr_{read,write}()

On 22.04.25 10:21, Xin Li (Intel) wrote:
> As pmu_msr_{read,write}() are now wrappers of pmu_msr_chk_emulated(),
> remove them and use pmu_msr_chk_emulated() directly.
> 
> While at it, convert the data type of MSR index to u32 in functions
> called in pmu_msr_chk_emulated().
> 
> Suggested-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@...or.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Li (Intel) <xin@...or.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
>   arch/x86/xen/pmu.c          | 24 ++++--------------------
>   arch/x86/xen/xen-ops.h      |  3 +--
>   3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
> index 1418758b57ff..b5a8bceb5f56 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
> @@ -1089,8 +1089,9 @@ static void xen_write_cr4(unsigned long cr4)
>   static u64 xen_do_read_msr(unsigned int msr, int *err)
>   {
>   	u64 val = 0;	/* Avoid uninitialized value for safe variant. */
> +	bool emulated;
>   
> -	if (pmu_msr_read(msr, &val, err))
> +	if (pmu_msr_chk_emulated(msr, &val, true, &emulated) && emulated)
>   		return val;
>   
>   	if (err)
> @@ -1133,6 +1134,7 @@ static void xen_do_write_msr(unsigned int msr, unsigned int low,
>   			     unsigned int high, int *err)
>   {
>   	u64 val;
> +	bool emulated;
>   
>   	switch (msr) {
>   	case MSR_FS_BASE:
> @@ -1162,12 +1164,13 @@ static void xen_do_write_msr(unsigned int msr, unsigned int low,
>   	default:
>   		val = (u64)high << 32 | low;
>   
> -		if (!pmu_msr_write(msr, val)) {
> -			if (err)
> -				*err = native_write_msr_safe(msr, low, high);
> -			else
> -				native_write_msr(msr, low, high);
> -		}
> +		if (pmu_msr_chk_emulated(msr, &val, false, &emulated) && emulated)
> +			return;
> +
> +		if (err)
> +			*err = native_write_msr_safe(msr, low, high);
> +		else
> +			native_write_msr(msr, low, high);
>   	}
>   }
>   
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/pmu.c b/arch/x86/xen/pmu.c
> index 95caae97a394..afb02f43ee3f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/pmu.c
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static inline uint32_t get_fam15h_addr(u32 addr)
>   	return addr;
>   }
>   
> -static inline bool is_amd_pmu_msr(unsigned int msr)
> +static bool is_amd_pmu_msr(u32 msr)
>   {
>   	if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD &&
>   	    boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_HYGON)
> @@ -194,8 +194,7 @@ static bool is_intel_pmu_msr(u32 msr_index, int *type, int *index)
>   	}
>   }
>   
> -static bool xen_intel_pmu_emulate(unsigned int msr, u64 *val, int type,
> -				  int index, bool is_read)
> +static bool xen_intel_pmu_emulate(u32 msr, u64 *val, int type, int index, bool is_read)
>   {
>   	uint64_t *reg = NULL;
>   	struct xen_pmu_intel_ctxt *ctxt;
> @@ -257,7 +256,7 @@ static bool xen_intel_pmu_emulate(unsigned int msr, u64 *val, int type,
>   	return false;
>   }
>   
> -static bool xen_amd_pmu_emulate(unsigned int msr, u64 *val, bool is_read)
> +static bool xen_amd_pmu_emulate(u32 msr, u64 *val, bool is_read)
>   {
>   	uint64_t *reg = NULL;
>   	int i, off = 0;
> @@ -298,8 +297,7 @@ static bool xen_amd_pmu_emulate(unsigned int msr, u64 *val, bool is_read)
>   	return false;
>   }
>   
> -static bool pmu_msr_chk_emulated(unsigned int msr, uint64_t *val, bool is_read,
> -				 bool *emul)
> +bool pmu_msr_chk_emulated(u32 msr, u64 *val, bool is_read, bool *emul)
>   {
>   	int type, index = 0;
>   
> @@ -313,20 +311,6 @@ static bool pmu_msr_chk_emulated(unsigned int msr, uint64_t *val, bool is_read,
>   	return true;
>   }
>   
> -bool pmu_msr_read(u32 msr, u64 *val)
> -{
> -	bool emulated;
> -
> -	return pmu_msr_chk_emulated(msr, val, true, &emulated) && emulated;
> -}
> -
> -bool pmu_msr_write(u32 msr, u64 val)
> -{
> -	bool emulated;
> -
> -	return pmu_msr_chk_emulated(msr, &val, false, &emulated) && emulated;
> -}
> -
>   static u64 xen_amd_read_pmc(int counter)
>   {
>   	struct xen_pmu_amd_ctxt *ctxt;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/xen-ops.h b/arch/x86/xen/xen-ops.h
> index a1875e10be31..fde9f9d7415f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/xen-ops.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/xen-ops.h
> @@ -271,8 +271,7 @@ void xen_pmu_finish(int cpu);
>   static inline void xen_pmu_init(int cpu) {}
>   static inline void xen_pmu_finish(int cpu) {}
>   #endif
> -bool pmu_msr_read(u32 msr, u64 *val);
> -bool pmu_msr_write(u32 msr, u64 val);
> +bool pmu_msr_chk_emulated(u32 msr, u64 *val, bool is_read, bool *emul);
>   int pmu_apic_update(uint32_t reg);
>   u64 xen_read_pmc(int counter);
>   

May I suggest to get rid of the "emul" parameter of pmu_msr_chk_emulated()?
It has no real value, as pmu_msr_chk_emulated() could easily return false in
the cases where it would set *emul to false.


Juergen

Download attachment "OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (3684 bytes)

Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (496 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ