[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <05ac9a81-66a9-4bbc-92e0-6ff47a6dc7ad@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 12:21:09 +0200
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
To: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...nel.org>, James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/14] nvmet-fcloop: don't wait for lport cleanup
On 4/23/25 15:21, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> The lifetime of the fcloop_lsreq is not tight to the lifetime of the
> host or target port, thus there is no need anymore to synchronize the
> cleanup path anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c | 21 ++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c b/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c
> index 47ce51183a66b4b37fc850cced2ddf70be2cdb42..ca11230bffedb0f2313a99e24e54e892daf0d644 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c
> @@ -207,7 +207,6 @@ static LIST_HEAD(fcloop_nports);
> struct fcloop_lport {
> struct nvme_fc_local_port *localport;
> struct list_head lport_list;
> - struct completion unreg_done;
> refcount_t ref;
> };
>
> @@ -1083,9 +1082,6 @@ fcloop_localport_delete(struct nvme_fc_local_port *localport)
> struct fcloop_lport_priv *lport_priv = localport->private;
> struct fcloop_lport *lport = lport_priv->lport;
>
> - /* release any threads waiting for the unreg to complete */
> - complete(&lport->unreg_done);
> -
> fcloop_lport_put(lport);
> }
>
> @@ -1238,18 +1234,9 @@ fcloop_create_local_port(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> }
>
> static int
> -__wait_localport_unreg(struct fcloop_lport *lport)
> +__localport_unreg(struct fcloop_lport *lport)
> {
> - int ret;
> -
> - init_completion(&lport->unreg_done);
> -
> - ret = nvme_fc_unregister_localport(lport->localport);
> -
> - if (!ret)
> - wait_for_completion(&lport->unreg_done);
> -
> - return ret;
> + return nvme_fc_unregister_localport(lport->localport);
> }
>
> static struct fcloop_nport *
> @@ -1332,7 +1319,7 @@ fcloop_delete_local_port(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> if (!lport)
> return -ENOENT;
>
> - ret = __wait_localport_unreg(lport);
> + ret = __localport_unreg(lport);
> fcloop_lport_put(lport);
>
> return ret ? ret : count;
> @@ -1776,7 +1763,7 @@ static void __exit fcloop_exit(void)
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fcloop_lock, flags);
>
> - ret = __wait_localport_unreg(lport);
> + ret = __localport_unreg(lport);
> if (ret)
> pr_warn("%s: Failed deleting local port\n", __func__);
>
>
And who is freeing the allocated fcloop_lsreq structures?
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@...e.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists