[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <orh3v7knajhmpv4uzmarpgdbfhkhtipjxc7agfmvlqdzggpwzz@yohc5d763ynp>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 13:22:34 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/msm/mdp4: register the LVDS PLL as a clock
provider
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 03:54:13PM -0700, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
>
> On 2/26/2025 6:25 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > The LVDS/LCDC controller uses pixel clock coming from the multimedia
> > controller (mmcc) rather than using the PLL directly. Stop using LVDS
> > PLL directly and register it as a clock provider. Use lcdc_clk as a
> > pixel clock for the LCDC.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp4/mdp4_kms.h | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp4/mdp4_lcdc_encoder.c | 8 +++++++-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp4/mdp4_lvds_pll.c | 22 +++++++---------------
> > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp4/mdp4_kms.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp4/mdp4_kms.h
> > index 142ccb68b435263f91ba1ab27676e426d43e5d84..b8bdc3712c73b14f3547dce3439a895e3d10f193 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp4/mdp4_kms.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp4/mdp4_kms.h
> > @@ -207,6 +207,6 @@ static inline struct drm_encoder *mdp4_dsi_encoder_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> > }
> > #endif
> > -struct clk *mpd4_lvds_pll_init(struct drm_device *dev);
> > +int mpd4_lvds_pll_init(struct drm_device *dev);
> > #endif /* __MDP4_KMS_H__ */
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp4/mdp4_lcdc_encoder.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp4/mdp4_lcdc_encoder.c
> > index 8bbc7fb881d599e7d309cc61bda83697fecd253a..db93795916cdaa87ac8e61d3b44c2dadac10fd9e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp4/mdp4_lcdc_encoder.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp4/mdp4_lcdc_encoder.c
> > @@ -381,7 +381,13 @@ struct drm_encoder *mdp4_lcdc_encoder_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> > drm_encoder_helper_add(encoder, &mdp4_lcdc_encoder_helper_funcs);
> > /* TODO: do we need different pll in other cases? */
> > - mdp4_lcdc_encoder->lcdc_clk = mpd4_lvds_pll_init(dev);
> > + ret = mpd4_lvds_pll_init(dev);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev->dev, "failed to register LVDS PLL\n");
> > + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > + }
> > +
> > + mdp4_lcdc_encoder->lcdc_clk = devm_clk_get(dev->dev, "lcdc_clk");
> > if (IS_ERR(mdp4_lcdc_encoder->lcdc_clk)) {
> > DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev->dev, "failed to get lvds_clk\n");
> > return ERR_CAST(mdp4_lcdc_encoder->lcdc_clk);
>
> Change seems fine to me, one question on the order of changes, DT change has
> to be merged first otherwise it will fail here?
It is already semi-broken, as just enabling the PLL is not enough. The
branch clocks in MMSS are to be toggled / manipulated. As such, it's
questionable if we need to coordinate or not.
>
> Will that be managed by co-ordinating with the DT maintainer?
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists