[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a0ff4fcb-2b9d-4b9f-b5e1-586ff3900719@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 13:53:31 +0300
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] dt-bindings: media: Add qcom,x1e80100-camss
Krzysztof,
On 4/24/25 13:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 24/04/2025 11:34, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 24/04/2025 07:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> + vdd-csiphy-0p8-supply:
>>> Same comment as other series on the lists - this is wrong name. There
>>> are no pins named like this and all existing bindings use different name.
>>
>> The existing bindings are unfortunately not granular enough.
>>
>> I'll post s series to capture pin-names per the SoC pinout shortly.
> How are the pins/supplies actually called?
>
concerning it I would appreciate if you can review/comment the v2 of SM8650
CAMSS dt bindings I've just sent recently [1], the equivalent property names on
that platform were named "vdda-csiXY-0p9-supply" for VDD_A_CSI_X_Y_0P9 pin.
I believe both these platforms and likely the following ones should provide
similar properties, thus it makes sense to discuss it at the same time.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20250423221954.1926453-2-vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org/
--
Best wishes,
Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists