[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9580167080271af15ef6f1f9d9baa586539bc34e.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 08:40:09 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@...il.com>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] net: register debugfs file for net_device refcnt
tracker
On Thu, 2025-04-24 at 16:07 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 3:52 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > But with all that said, I guess you still want the "meaningful" ID for
> > the netns, and that one is in fact stable :S
>
> We could add a stable id for net devices, and use it for this purpose
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index 0321fd952f70887735ac789d72f72948a3879832..339d09167eaf7f58fc877fa470c94175237ce534
> 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -2544,6 +2544,8 @@ struct net_device {
>
> struct hwtstamp_provider __rcu *hwprov;
>
> + u64 permanent_id;
> +
> u8 priv[] ____cacheline_aligned
> __counted_by(priv_len);
> } ____cacheline_aligned;
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index d1a8cad0c99c47996e8bda44bf220266a5e51102..9d2d45e0246fab99ad3e7523885224bd114fa686
> 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -10954,6 +10954,9 @@ int register_netdevice(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> int ret;
> struct net *net = dev_net(dev);
> + static atomic64_t permanent_id;
> +
> + dev->permanent_id = atomic64_inc_return(&permanent_id);
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(netdev_features_t) * BITS_PER_BYTE <
> NETDEV_FEATURE_COUNT);
That would give us uniqueness, but the name doesn't mean anything and
it wouldn't be trivial to track down which ref_tracker/netdev-* file
refers to which device.
If we're going to go that route, we're probably better off just
embedding the address in the name using a "netdev@%px" format.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists