[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250425-adf6ca95915c46a5403fb742@orel>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 15:05:22 +0200
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
To: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>, Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...tanamicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] KVM: RISC-V: remove unnecessary SBI reset state
On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 01:25:22PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> The SBI reset state has only two variables -- pc and a1.
> The rest is known, so keep only the necessary information.
>
> The reset structures make sense if we want userspace to control the
> reset state (which we do), but I'd still remove them now and reintroduce
> with the userspace interface later -- we could probably have just a
> single reset state per VM, instead of a reset state for each VCPU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...tanamicro.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_aia.h | 3 --
> arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 12 ++++---
> arch/riscv/kvm/aia_device.c | 4 +--
> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++--------------
> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c | 9 +++--
> 5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists