linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/6] memcontrol: rename mem_cgroup_scan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aAucfUFeqHBaHfKs@tiehlicka>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 16:30:21 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: xu xin <xu.xin.sc@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, xu.xin16@....com.cn,
	david@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	wang.yaxin@....com.cn, yang.yang29@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/6] memcontrol: rename mem_cgroup_scan_tasks()

On Wed 23-04-25 13:22:07, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 04:29:52PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Patchset looks nice to me, thanks.  I'll await reviewer feedback before
> > proceeding.
> 
> I thought we had a policy against adding new features to memcg-v1?
> Certainly adding the feature to memcg-v2 would be a requirement before
> it could be added to v1.

Completely agreed! Is there any reason why v2 was not the first choice?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs