[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <2EDC209B-7D6B-4EFB-ADD0-58D494D8AF98@fluxnic.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 11:13:40 -0500
From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Nicolas Pitre <npitre@...libre.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/14] vt: implement proper Unicode handling
> Le 25 avr. 2025 à 09:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> a écrit :
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 02:45:02PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> The Linux VT console has many problems with regards to proper Unicode
>> handling:
>>
>> - All new double-width Unicode code points which have been introduced since
>> Unicode 5.0 are not recognized as such (we're at Unicode 16.0 now).
>>
>> - Zero-width code points are not recognized at all. If you try to edit files
>> containing a lot of emojis, you will see the rendering issues. When there
>> are a lot of zero-width characters (like "variation selectors"), long
>> lines get wrapped, but any Unicode-aware editor thinks that the content
>> was rendered properly and its rendering logic starts to work in very bad
>> ways. Combine this with tmux or screen, and there is a huge mess going on
>> in the terminal.
>>
>> - Also, text which uses combining diacritics has the same effect as text
>> with zero-width characters as programs expect the characters to take fewer
>> columns than what they actually do.
>>
>> Some may argue that the Linux VT console is unmaintained and/or not used
>> much any longer and that one should consider a user space terminal
>> alternative instead. But every such alternative that is not less maintained
>> than the Linux VT console does require a full heavy graphical environment
>> and that is the exact antithesis of what the Linux console is meant to be.
>>
>> Furthermore, there is a significant Linux console user base represented by
>> blind users (which I'm a member of) for whom the alternatives are way more
>> cumbersome to use reducing our productivity. So it has to stay and
>> be maintained to the best of our abilities.
>>
>> That being said...
>>
>> This patch series is about fixing all the above issues. This is accomplished
>> with some Python scripts leveraging Python's unicodedata module to generate
>> C code with lookup tables that is suitable for the kernel. In summary:
>>
>> - The double-width code point table is updated to the latest Unicode version
>> and the table itself is optimized to reduce its size.
>>
>> - A zero-width code point table is created and the console code is modified
>> to properly use it.
>>
>> - A table with base character + combining mark pairs is created to convert
>> them into their precomposed equivalents when they're encountered.
>> By default the generated table contains most commonly used Latin, Greek,
>> and Cyrillic recomposition pairs only, but one can execute the provided
>> script with the --full argument to create a table that covers all
>> possibilities. Combining marks that are not listed in the table are simply
>> treated like zero-width code points and properly ignored.
>>
>> - All those tables plus related lookup code require about 3500 additional
>> bytes of text which is not very significant these days. Yet, one
>> can still set CONFIG_CONSOLE_TRANSLATIONS=n to configure this all out
>> if need be.
>>
>> Note: The generated C code makes scripts/checkpatch.pl complain about
>> "... exceeds 100 columns" because the inserted comments with code
>> point names, well, make some inlines exceed 100 columns. Please make
>> an exception for those files and disregard those warnings. When
>> checkpatch.pl is used on those files directly with -f then it doesn't
>> complain.
>>
>> This series was tested on top of v6.15-rc2.
>
> I've taken the first version of this, should I revert all of them and
> then apply these, or do you want to send a diff between this and what is
> in the tty-next tree?
Please remove what you have and replace with this v3. Will be much cleaner this way.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists