linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] e1000e: disregard NVM checksum on tgp when valid checksum mask is not set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250425164510.GP3042781@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 17:45:10 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Jacek Kowalski <jacek@...ekk.info>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000e: disregard NVM checksum on tgp when valid
 checksum mask is not set

On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 07:37:26PM +0200, Jacek Kowalski wrote:
> > Although I do wonder if commit 4051f68318ca9 is backported,
> > will this patch (once accepted) end up being backported far enough?
> 
> Stable 5.10 (and newer) already has 4051f68318ca9 and ffd24fa2fcc7:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c?h=linux-5.10.y#n4139
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c?h=linux-5.10.y&id=8f1e3ad9456935f538c4ba06d2c04f2581ec385f
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c?h=linux-5.10.y&id=eb5e444fe37d467e54d2945c1293f311ce782f67
> 
> In my opinion my patch should be backported as well.

Yes, I agree.