[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2950819.ElGaqSPkdT@workhorse>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 20:22:55 +0200
From: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@...cinc.com>, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@...euvizoso.net>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] accel/rocket: Add a new driver for Rockchip's NPU
On Tuesday, 25 February 2025 08:55:50 Central European Summer Time Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> This initial version supports the NPU as shipped in the RK3588 SoC and
> described in the first part of its TRM, in Chapter 36.
>
> This NPU contains 3 independent cores that the driver can submit jobs
> to.
>
> This commit adds just hardware initialization and power management.
>
> v2:
> - Split cores and IOMMUs as independent devices (Sebastian Reichel)
> - Add some documentation (Jeffrey Hugo)
> - Be more explicit in the Kconfig documentation (Jeffrey Hugo)
> - Remove resets, as these haven't been found useful so far (Zenghui Yu)
> - Repack structs (Jeffrey Hugo)
> - Use DEFINE_DRM_ACCEL_FOPS (Jeffrey Hugo)
> - Use devm_drm_dev_alloc (Jeffrey Hugo)
> - Use probe log helper (Jeffrey Hugo)
> - Introduce UABI header in a later patch (Jeffrey Hugo)
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@...euvizoso.net>
> ---
> Documentation/accel/index.rst | 1 +
> Documentation/accel/rocket/index.rst | 19 +
> MAINTAINERS | 8 +
> drivers/accel/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/accel/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/accel/rocket/Kconfig | 25 +
> drivers/accel/rocket/Makefile | 8 +
> drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_core.c | 71 +
> drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_core.h | 29 +
> drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.c | 29 +
> drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.h | 29 +
> drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c | 273 ++
> drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.h | 13 +
> drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_registers.h | 4425 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 14 files changed, 4932 insertions(+)
>
> [...]
> diff --git a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c22d965f20f1239a36b1d823d5fe5f372713555d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,273 @@
> [...]
> +static int rocket_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct component_match *match = NULL;
> + struct device_node *core_node;
> +
> + if (fwnode_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.fwnode, "rockchip,rk3588-rknn-core"))
> + return component_add(&pdev->dev, &rocket_core_ops);
> +
> + for_each_compatible_node(core_node, NULL, "rockchip,rk3588-rknn-core") {
> + if (!of_device_is_available(core_node))
> + continue;
> +
> + drm_of_component_match_add(&pdev->dev, &match,
> + component_compare_of, core_node);
> + }
> +
> + return component_master_add_with_match(&pdev->dev, &rocket_drm_ops, match);
> +}
Hi Tomeu,
something I've noticed while playing with this: currently, it doesn't seem like
it's possible to support 1-core NPUs. rknn-core-top is a real core, but if no
rknn-core is enabled beside it, it'll call component_master_add_with_match with
match being NULL. This causes a kernel Oops.
I'm not sure what the proper fix is, since the component API doesn't seem to
really have a consideration for a master with no other components.
I ran into this when I was trying to debug why I get job timeouts followed by
a full SoC lock-up on RK3576 by running with only one of the two cores enabled.
As an aside note, my throwaway rocket-on-RK3576-hacking-branch is at [1] and
contains some changes you may want to consider for v3, e.g. [2] and [3]+[4]. In
[4], specifically the `domain-supply` part which means the NPU regulators don't
have to be always-on. Though feel free to pull in my entire ROCK 5B enablement
patch.
Kind regards,
Nicolas Frattaroli, who discovered that his cat is apparently 5% space heater
according to mobilenet while playing with this patch series.
[1]: https://gitlab.collabora.com/fratti/linux/-/commits/tomeu-npu?ref_type=heads
[2]: https://gitlab.collabora.com/fratti/linux/-/commit/73aba31a00b34c254be575b524da568e115d985d
[3]: https://gitlab.collabora.com/fratti/linux/-/commit/bd3a7bf5054c54c2915a9dc0396730d0f24b3b7c
[4]: https://gitlab.collabora.com/fratti/linux/-/commit/5da44d61b09c345309f76159574d447d071c295d
Powered by blists - more mailing lists