[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250425195757.2139558-1-jstultz@google.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 12:57:55 -0700
From: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
peter-yc.chang@...iatek.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH v2] sched/core: Tweak wait_task_inactive() to force
dequeue sched_delayed tasks
It was reported that in 6.12, smpboot_create_threads() was
taking much longer then in 6.6.
I narrowed down the call path to:
smpboot_create_threads()
-> kthread_create_on_cpu()
-> kthread_bind()
-> __kthread_bind_mask()
->wait_task_inactive()
Where in wait_task_inactive() we were regularly hitting the
queued case, which sets a 1 tick timeout, which when called
multiple times in a row, accumulates quickly into a long
delay.
I noticed disabling the DELAY_DEQUEUE sched feature recovered
the performance, and it seems the newly create tasks are usually
sched_delayed and left on the runqueue.
So in wait_task_inactive() when we see the task
p->se.sched_delayed, manually dequeue the sched_delayed task
with DEQUEUE_DELAYED, so we don't have to constantly wait a
tick.
This seems to work, but I've only lightly tested it, so I'd love
close review and feedback in case I've missed something in
wait_task_inactive(), or if there is a simpler alternative
approach.
NOTE: Peter did highlight[1] his general distaste for the
kthread_bind() through wait_task_inactive() functions, which
suggests a deeper rework might be better, but I'm not familiar
enough with all its users to have a sense of how that might be
done, and this fix seems to address the problem and be more
easily backported to 6.12-stable, so I wanted to submit it
again, as a potentially more short-term solution.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250422085628.GA14170@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net/
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
Cc: kernel-team@...roid.com
Reported-by: peter-yc.chang@...iatek.com
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
---
v2:
* Rework & simplify the check as suggested by K Prateek Nayak
* Added Reported-by tag for proper attribution
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index c81cf642dba05..b986cd2fb19b7 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2283,6 +2283,12 @@ unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int match_state
* just go back and repeat.
*/
rq = task_rq_lock(p, &rf);
+ /*
+ * If task is sched_delayed, force dequeue it, to avoid always
+ * hitting the tick timeout in the queued case
+ */
+ if (p->se.sched_delayed)
+ dequeue_task(rq, p, DEQUEUE_SLEEP | DEQUEUE_DELAYED);
trace_sched_wait_task(p);
running = task_on_cpu(rq, p);
queued = task_on_rq_queued(p);
--
2.49.0.850.g28803427d3-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists