[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202504251601.5D29BF8F01@keescook>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 16:03:16 -0700
From: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>, cocci@...ia.fr
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] kthread: Add is_user_thread() and
is_kernel_thread() helper functions
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 04:41:21PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> In order to know if a task is a user thread or a kernel thread it is
> recommended to test the task flags for PF_KTHREAD. The old way was to
> check if the task mm pointer is NULL.
>
> It is an easy mistake to not test the flag correctly, as:
>
> if (!(task->flag & PF_KTHREAD))
>
> Is not immediately obvious that it's testing for a user thread.
>
> Add helper functions:
>
> is_user_thread()
> is_kernel_thread()
>
> that can make seeing what is being tested for much more obvious:
>
> if (is_user_thread(task))
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250425133416.63d3e3b8@gandalf.local.home/
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index f96ac1982893..823f38b0fd3e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1785,6 +1785,16 @@ static __always_inline bool is_percpu_thread(void)
> #endif
> }
>
> +static __always_inline bool is_user_thread(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + return !(task->flags & PF_KTHREAD);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline bool is_kernel_thread(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + return task->flags & PF_KTHREAD;
nit: maybe do explicit type conversion:
return !!(task->flags & PF_KTHREAD);
but that's just a style issue, really.
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Thank you for not using current->mm -- KUnit, live patching, etc, all
use current->mm but are kthreads. :)
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists