lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250425-hopeful-dexterous-ibex-b9adce@kuoka>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 09:41:32 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>, 
	Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Prathosh Satish <Prathosh.Satish@...rochip.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/8] dt-bindings: dpll: Add support for
 Microchip Azurite chip family

On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 05:47:16PM GMT, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> Add DT bindings for Microchip Azurite DPLL chip family. These chips
> provide up to 5 independent DPLL channels, 10 differential or
> single-ended inputs and 10 differential or 20 single-ended outputs.
> They can be connected via I2C or SPI busses.
> 
> Check:
> $ make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=/dpll/

None of these commands belong to the commit msg. Look at all other
commits: do you see it anywhere?

>   SCHEMA  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
> /home/cera/devel/kernel/linux-2.6/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml: mac-mode: missing type definition
>   CHKDT   ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings
>   LINT    ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings
>   DTC [C] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dpll/dpll-pin.example.dtb
>   DTEX    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dpll/microchip,zl30731.example.dts
>   DTC [C] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dpll/microchip,zl30731.example.dtb
>   DTC [C] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dpll/dpll-device.example.dtb
> 

With above fixed:

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>

---

<form letter>
This is an automated instruction, just in case, because many review tags
are being ignored. If you know the process, you can skip it (please do
not feel offended by me posting it here - no bad intentions intended).
If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no
need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer
will do that for tags received on the version they apply.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ