[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250425081715.1341199-9-david@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 10:17:12 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org,
x86@...nel.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@...e.de>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 08/11] x86/mm/pat: remove strict_prot parameter from reserve_pfn_range()
Always set to 0, so let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c | 12 +++---------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c
index 668ebf0065157..57e3ced4c28cb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c
@@ -858,8 +858,7 @@ int memtype_kernel_map_sync(u64 base, unsigned long size,
* Reserved non RAM regions only and after successful memtype_reserve,
* this func also keeps identity mapping (if any) in sync with this new prot.
*/
-static int reserve_pfn_range(u64 paddr, unsigned long size, pgprot_t *vma_prot,
- int strict_prot)
+static int reserve_pfn_range(u64 paddr, unsigned long size, pgprot_t *vma_prot)
{
int is_ram = 0;
int ret;
@@ -895,8 +894,7 @@ static int reserve_pfn_range(u64 paddr, unsigned long size, pgprot_t *vma_prot,
return ret;
if (pcm != want_pcm) {
- if (strict_prot ||
- !is_new_memtype_allowed(paddr, size, want_pcm, pcm)) {
+ if (!is_new_memtype_allowed(paddr, size, want_pcm, pcm)) {
memtype_free(paddr, paddr + size);
pr_err("x86/PAT: %s:%d map pfn expected mapping type %s for [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx], got %s\n",
current->comm, current->pid,
@@ -906,10 +904,6 @@ static int reserve_pfn_range(u64 paddr, unsigned long size, pgprot_t *vma_prot,
cattr_name(pcm));
return -EINVAL;
}
- /*
- * We allow returning different type than the one requested in
- * non strict case.
- */
pgprot_set_cachemode(vma_prot, pcm);
}
@@ -959,7 +953,7 @@ int pfnmap_track(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long size, pgprot_t *prot)
{
const resource_size_t paddr = (resource_size_t)pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
- return reserve_pfn_range(paddr, size, prot, 0);
+ return reserve_pfn_range(paddr, size, prot);
}
void pfnmap_untrack(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long size)
--
2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists