[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87selwy6cg.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 11:48:31 +0300
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@...a.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, John
Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, Sergey Senozhatsky
<senozhatsky@...omium.org>, Jon Pan-Doh <pandoh@...gle.com>, Bjorn Helgaas
<bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Karolina Stolarek <karolina.stolarek@...cle.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Joonas Lahtinen
<joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/20] drm/i915: Avoid open-coded use of
ratelimit_state structure's ->missed field
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> The i915_oa_stream_destroy() function directly accesses the
> ratelimit_state structure's ->missed field, which work, but which also
> makes it more difficult to change this field. Therefore, make use of
> the ratelimit_state_get_miss() function instead of directly accessing
> the ->missed field.
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
For merging via whichever tree is convenient for you. Please let us know
if you want us to pick it up via drm-intel.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/fbe93a52-365e-47fe-93a4-44a44547d601@paulmck-laptop/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250423115409.3425-1-spasswolf@web.de/
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>
> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
> Cc: Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>
> Cc: <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>
> Cc: <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> index de0b413600a15..1658f1246c6fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> @@ -1666,6 +1666,7 @@ static void i915_oa_stream_destroy(struct i915_perf_stream *stream)
> struct i915_perf *perf = stream->perf;
> struct intel_gt *gt = stream->engine->gt;
> struct i915_perf_group *g = stream->engine->oa_group;
> + int m;
>
> if (WARN_ON(stream != g->exclusive_stream))
> return;
> @@ -1690,10 +1691,9 @@ static void i915_oa_stream_destroy(struct i915_perf_stream *stream)
> free_oa_configs(stream);
> free_noa_wait(stream);
>
> - if (perf->spurious_report_rs.missed) {
> - gt_notice(gt, "%d spurious OA report notices suppressed due to ratelimiting\n",
> - perf->spurious_report_rs.missed);
> - }
> + m = ratelimit_state_get_miss(&perf->spurious_report_rs);
> + if (m)
> + gt_notice(gt, "%d spurious OA report notices suppressed due to ratelimiting\n", m);
> }
>
> static void gen7_init_oa_buffer(struct i915_perf_stream *stream)
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists