lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <luamtq6xhvmxat4ywhrawc5q5fjfhjnz3ku3c3k7aitjdbjacr@hmhf6ip76z7z>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 11:51:35 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
        Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] dt-bindings: media: Add qcom,x1e80100-camss

On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 09:35:05AM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 25/04/2025 09:26, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > What should driver do if:
> > 
> > vdd-csiphy0-1p2-supply = <&vreg_1p2_ex0>; <- individual supply in PCB
> > vdd-csiphy1-1p2-supply = <&vreg_1p2_ex1>; <- individual supply in PCB
> > 
> > vdd-csiphy0-0p8-supply = <&vreg_0p9_ex0>; <- shared pin in the SoC
> > vdd-csiphy1-0p8-supply = <&vreg_0p9_ex1>; <- should be shared pin
> > 
> > I don't want to allow DT authors to make this kind of mistake.
> 
> I require anybody submitting patches to show how they tested this.
> 
> So you'd have to lie about testing it for a mistake like that to get
> through.

It's easy to miss it.

I think, the supplies should be reflecting actual pins on the SoC.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ