[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <luamtq6xhvmxat4ywhrawc5q5fjfhjnz3ku3c3k7aitjdbjacr@hmhf6ip76z7z>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 11:51:35 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] dt-bindings: media: Add qcom,x1e80100-camss
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 09:35:05AM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 25/04/2025 09:26, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > What should driver do if:
> >
> > vdd-csiphy0-1p2-supply = <&vreg_1p2_ex0>; <- individual supply in PCB
> > vdd-csiphy1-1p2-supply = <&vreg_1p2_ex1>; <- individual supply in PCB
> >
> > vdd-csiphy0-0p8-supply = <&vreg_0p9_ex0>; <- shared pin in the SoC
> > vdd-csiphy1-0p8-supply = <&vreg_0p9_ex1>; <- should be shared pin
> >
> > I don't want to allow DT authors to make this kind of mistake.
>
> I require anybody submitting patches to show how they tested this.
>
> So you'd have to lie about testing it for a mistake like that to get
> through.
It's easy to miss it.
I think, the supplies should be reflecting actual pins on the SoC.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists