linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: amd: acp: Fix NULL pointer deref on acp resume path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025042554-gallon-coyness-3f58@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 11:05:01 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Venkata Prasad Potturu <venkataprasad.potturu@....com>,
	linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Basavaraj Hiregoudar <Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@....com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Sunil-kumar Dommati <Sunil-kumar.Dommati@....com>,
	Syed Saba Kareem <Syed.SabaKareem@....com>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
	Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>,
	Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: amd: acp: Fix NULL pointer deref on acp resume
 path

On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 10:55:16AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > update chip data using dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent) instead of
> > dev_get_platdata(dev).
> …
> 
> * Would you get into the mood to replace the text “deref” in the summary phrase?
> 
> * Can a cover letter usually be helpful for such a patch series?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Markus

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all.  The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback.  Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot