[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250425111256.GE1166@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 13:12:56 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Liang@...gle.com,
Kan <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@...el.com>,
Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>,
Zide Chen <zide.chen@...el.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@...gle.com>,
Shukla Manali <Manali.Shukla@....com>,
Nikunj Dadhania <nikunj.dadhania@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/38] perf: Add switch_guest_ctx() interface
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 05:30:49PM +0000, Mingwei Zhang wrote:
> @@ -1822,7 +1835,7 @@ extern int perf_event_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 value);
> extern u64 perf_event_pause(struct perf_event *event, bool reset);
> int perf_get_mediated_pmu(void);
> void perf_put_mediated_pmu(void);
> -void perf_guest_enter(void);
> +void perf_guest_enter(u32 guest_lvtpc);
> void perf_guest_exit(void);
> #else /* !CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS: */
> static inline void *
> @@ -1921,7 +1934,7 @@ static inline int perf_get_mediated_pmu(void)
> }
>
> static inline void perf_put_mediated_pmu(void) { }
> -static inline void perf_guest_enter(void) { }
> +static inline void perf_guest_enter(u32 guest_lvtpc) { }
> static inline void perf_guest_exit(void) { }
> #endif
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index d05487d465c9..406b86641f02 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -451,6 +451,7 @@ static inline bool is_include_guest_event(struct perf_event *event)
> static LIST_HEAD(pmus);
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(pmus_lock);
> static struct srcu_struct pmus_srcu;
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct mediated_pmus_list, mediated_pmus);
> static cpumask_var_t perf_online_mask;
> static cpumask_var_t perf_online_core_mask;
> static cpumask_var_t perf_online_die_mask;
> @@ -6053,8 +6054,26 @@ static inline void perf_host_exit(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
> }
> }
>
> +static void perf_switch_guest_ctx(bool enter, u32 guest_lvtpc)
> +{
> + struct mediated_pmus_list *pmus = this_cpu_ptr(&mediated_pmus);
> + struct perf_cpu_pmu_context *cpc;
> + struct pmu *pmu;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(cpc, &pmus->list, mediated_entry) {
> + pmu = cpc->epc.pmu;
> +
> + if (pmu->switch_guest_ctx)
> + pmu->switch_guest_ctx(enter, (void *)&guest_lvtpc);
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +}
> +
> /* When entering a guest, schedule out all exclude_guest events. */
> -void perf_guest_enter(void)
> +void perf_guest_enter(u32 guest_lvtpc)
> {
> struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = this_cpu_ptr(&perf_cpu_context);
>
> @@ -6067,6 +6086,8 @@ void perf_guest_enter(void)
>
> perf_host_exit(cpuctx);
>
> + perf_switch_guest_ctx(true, guest_lvtpc);
> +
> __this_cpu_write(perf_in_guest, true);
>
> unlock:
This, I'm still utterly hating on that lvtpc argument. That doesn't
belong here. Make it go away.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists