[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABjd4YynxcBT+q69GuXwM447uXmGbkZ4JxFF=c0M9+R25dnvtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 15:41:28 +0400
From: Alexey Charkov <alchark@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: arm: vt8500: Add VIA APC Rock/Paper boards
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 2:19 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 07:24:25PM GMT, Alexey Charkov wrote:
> > APC Rock is a development board based on WonderMedia WM8950 SoC
> > released around 2013. Paper is the same as Rock but lacking a
> > VGA port and shipped with a recycled cardboard case.
> >
> > While at that, put myself as the maintainer, given that Tony is
> > unavailable as of lately.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Charkov <alchark@...il.com>
> > ---
> > Split the series from v1 into separate bindings patches so as not to
>
> Hm? That's odd.
Now that you've asked it (and in light of your comment below) I
realize that Rob referred to rewrites of old textual bindings into
YAML schemas, and probably not this patch in particular.
> > spam all the subsystems with unrelated changes, per Rob's suggestion
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - kept single-valued compatibles in a single enum (thanks Rob)
> > - dropped the empty overall description node
>
> ...
>
> > +
> > + - description: VIA APC Rock and Paper boards
> > + items:
> > + - const: via,apc-rock
>
> Where is any user of this? Bindings always come with the user. Board
> compatible comes with its user - board - both to SoC subsystem (in this
> case me).
The DTS addition was in the original "merged" series [1]. I will
resubmit it along with this binding change: it has no external
dependencies so should not create any hassle (i.e. it can be merged in
any order vs. other VT8500 DTS additions and cleanups that I'm doing).
> See also SoC maintainer profile describing this or my guides how to
> properly target SoC subsystems:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/CADrjBPq_0nUYRABKpskRF_dhHu+4K=duPVZX==0pr+cjSL_caQ@mail.gmail.com/T/#m2d9130a1342ab201ab49670fa6c858ee3724c83c
>
> and great example:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231121-topic-sm8650-upstream-dt-v3-0-db9d0507ffd3@linaro.org/
These are great explainers, thanks a lot for pointing them out!
Best regards,
Alexey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists