[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250425-eskapaden-regnen-4534af2aef11@brauner>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 13:57:13 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Benjamin Drung <benjamin.drung@...onical.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi@...il.com>, Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@...il.com>, Mike Yuan <me@...dnzj.com>,
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@...waw.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] coredump: hand a pidfd to the usermode coredump
helper
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 01:31:56PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 15:55 +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > Give userspace a way to instruct the kernel to install a pidfd into the
> > usermode helper process. This makes coredump handling a lot more
> > reliable for userspace. In parallel with this commit we already have
> > systemd adding support for this in [1].
> >
> > We create a pidfs file for the coredumping process when we process the
> > corename pattern. When the usermode helper process is forked we then
> > install the pidfs file as file descriptor three into the usermode
> > helpers file descriptor table so it's available to the exec'd program.
> >
> > Since usermode helpers are either children of the system_unbound_wq
> > workqueue or kthreadd we know that the file descriptor table is empty
> > and can thus always use three as the file descriptor number.
> >
> > Note, that we'll install a pidfd for the thread-group leader even if a
> > subthread is calling do_coredump(). We know that task linkage hasn't
> > been removed due to delay_group_leader() and even if this @current isn't
> > the actual thread-group leader we know that the thread-group leader
> > cannot be reaped until @current has exited.
> >
> > Link: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/37125 [1]
> > Tested-by: Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/coredump.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > include/linux/coredump.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/coredump.c b/fs/coredump.c
> > index 9da592aa8f16..403be0ff780e 100644
> > --- a/fs/coredump.c
> > +++ b/fs/coredump.c
> > @@ -43,6 +43,9 @@
> > #include <linux/timekeeping.h>
> > #include <linux/sysctl.h>
> > #include <linux/elf.h>
> > +#include <linux/pidfs.h>
> > +#include <uapi/linux/pidfd.h>
> > +#include <linux/vfsdebug.h>
> >
> > #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> > #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
> > @@ -60,6 +63,12 @@ static void free_vma_snapshot(struct coredump_params *cprm);
> > #define CORE_FILE_NOTE_SIZE_DEFAULT (4*1024*1024)
> > /* Define a reasonable max cap */
> > #define CORE_FILE_NOTE_SIZE_MAX (16*1024*1024)
> > +/*
> > + * File descriptor number for the pidfd for the thread-group leader of
> > + * the coredumping task installed into the usermode helper's file
> > + * descriptor table.
> > + */
> > +#define COREDUMP_PIDFD_NUMBER 3
> >
> > static int core_uses_pid;
> > static unsigned int core_pipe_limit;
> > @@ -339,6 +348,27 @@ static int format_corename(struct core_name *cn, struct coredump_params *cprm,
> > case 'C':
> > err = cn_printf(cn, "%d", cprm->cpu);
> > break;
> > + /* pidfd number */
> > + case 'F': {
> > + /*
> > + * Installing a pidfd only makes sense if
> > + * we actually spawn a usermode helper.
> > + */
> > + if (!ispipe)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Note that we'll install a pidfd for the
> > + * thread-group leader. We know that task
> > + * linkage hasn't been removed yet and even if
> > + * this @current isn't the actual thread-group
> > + * leader we know that the thread-group leader
> > + * cannot be reaped until @current has exited.
> > + */
> > + cprm->pid = task_tgid(current);
> > + err = cn_printf(cn, "%d", COREDUMP_PIDFD_NUMBER);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > default:
> > break;
> > }
> >
>
> I tried this change with Apport: I took the Ubuntu mainline kernel build
> https://kernel.ubuntu.com/mainline/daily/2025-04-24/ (that refers to
> mainline commit e54f9b0410347c49b7ffdd495578811e70d7a407) and applied
> these three patches on top. Then I modified Apport to take the
> additional `-F%F` and tested that on Ubuntu 25.04 (plucky). The result
> is the coredump failed as long as there was `-F%F` on
I have no clue what -F%F is and whether that leading -F is something
specific to Apport but the specifier is %F not -F%F. For example:
> cat /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
|/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-coredump %P %u %g %s %t %c %h %F
And note that this requires the pipe logic to be used, aka "|" needs to
be specified. Without it this doesn't make sense.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists