linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tools/nolibc: Add m68k support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFr9PXkU3W6DdYKhHz13K7bk9bnik67R85wqYUwHeROKEx59zA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2025 15:16:35 +0900
From: Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: linux@...ssschuh.net, linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org, geert@...ux-m68k.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/nolibc: Add m68k support

Hi Willy,

On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 at 14:14, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> wrote:
> Nice, thank you! Could you please also add support for it to
> tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/ and verify that it works ?

Sure, doing that now. For now it'll be using the mmu enabled m68k virt
machine that QEMU supports out of the box.

> changes. You may possible have to add a few ifndef, as I don't
> think we've ever had a nommu platform yet. If you face too many
> failures or just difficulties, please let us know so that we can
> figure together a suitable solution.

I need to test actually building and running something for nommu but I
will do that later today.
Making nommu test automatically might be a bit difficult though as I
think it only really works with some changes I have to linux and QEMU.

Cheers,

Daniel