linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net] xsk: respect the offsets when copying frags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250425172339.21a66c9b@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 17:23:39 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel
 Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, John Fastabend
 <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Maciej Fijalkowski
 <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>, Alexander Lobakin
 <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] xsk: respect the offsets when copying frags

On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 22:46:35 +0700 Bui Quang Minh wrote:
> On 4/23/25 17:10, Bui Quang Minh wrote:
> > Add the missing offsets when copying frags in xdp_copy_frags_from_zc().
> >
> > Fixes: 560d958c6c68 ("xsk: add generic XSk &xdp_buff -> skb conversion")
> > Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@...il.com>
> > ---
> >   net/core/xdp.c | 7 ++++---
> >   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/core/xdp.c b/net/core/xdp.c
> > index f86eedad586a..a723dc301f94 100644
> > --- a/net/core/xdp.c
> > +++ b/net/core/xdp.c
> > @@ -697,7 +697,8 @@ static noinline bool xdp_copy_frags_from_zc(struct sk_buff *skb,
> >   	nr_frags = xinfo->nr_frags;
> >   
> >   	for (u32 i = 0; i < nr_frags; i++) {
> > -		u32 len = skb_frag_size(&xinfo->frags[i]);
> > +		const skb_frag_t *frag = &xinfo->frags[i];
> > +		u32 len = skb_frag_size(frag);
> >   		u32 offset, truesize = len;
> >   		netmem_ref netmem;
> >   
> > @@ -707,8 +708,8 @@ static noinline bool xdp_copy_frags_from_zc(struct sk_buff *skb,
> >   			return false;
> >   		}
> >   
> > -		memcpy(__netmem_address(netmem),
> > -		       __netmem_address(xinfo->frags[i].netmem),
> > +		memcpy(__netmem_address(netmem) + offset,
> > +		       __netmem_address(frag->netmem) + skb_frag_off(frag),
> >   		       LARGEST_ALIGN(len));
> >   		__skb_fill_netmem_desc_noacc(sinfo, i, netmem, offset, len);
> >     
> 
> I know it's very unlikely but do we need to 
> kmap_local_page(skb_frag_page(frag) before using 
> __netmem_address(frag->netmem) to make sure the frag's page is mapped? 
> Or it is impossible that the frag's page to be highmem and unmapped?

AFAIU these frags come from a AF_XDP umem so they should be mapped
already.