[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aAyiganPp_UsNlnZ@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2025 11:08:17 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mateusz Jończyk <mat.jonczyk@...pl>,
"Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] x86/cpu: rework instruction set selection
* Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> With cx8 and tsc being mandatory features, the only important
> architectural features are now cmov and pae.
>
> Change the large list of target CPUs to no longer pick the instruction set
> itself but only the mtune= optimization level and in-kernel optimizations
> that remain compatible with all cores.
>
> The CONFIG_X86_CMOV instead becomes user-selectable and is now how
> Kconfig picks between 586-class (Pentium, Pentium MMX, K6, C3, GeodeGX)
> and 686-class (everything else) targets.
>
> In order to allow running on late 32-bit cores (Athlon, Pentium-M,
> Pentium 4, ...), the X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT can no longer be set to anything
> lower than 6 (i.e. 64 byte cache lines).
>
> The optimization options now depend on X86_CMOV and X86_PAE instead
> of the other way round, while other compile-time conditionals that
> checked for MATOM/MGEODEGX1 instead now check for CPU_SUP_* options
> that enable support for a particular CPU family.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/dd29df0c-0b4f-44e6-b71b-2a358ea76fb4@app.fastmail.com/
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> This is what I had in mind as mentioned in the earlier thread on
> cx8/tsc removal. I based this on top of the Ingo's [RFC 15/15]
> patch.
> ---
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +-
> arch/x86/Kconfig.cpu | 100 ++++++++++++++------------------
> arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu | 48 +++++++--------
> arch/x86/include/asm/vermagic.h | 36 +-----------
> arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/xen/Kconfig | 1 -
> drivers/misc/mei/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 7 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
While the simplification is nice on its face, this looks messy:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index a9d717558972..1e33f88c9b97 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -1438,7 +1438,7 @@ config HIGHMEM
>
> config X86_PAE
> bool "PAE (Physical Address Extension) Support"
> - depends on X86_32 && X86_HAVE_PAE
> + depends on X86_32 && X86_CMOV
Coupling CMOV to PAE ... :-/
> +config X86_CMOV
> + bool "Require 686-class CMOV instructions" if X86_32
> + default y
> help
> - This is the processor type of your CPU. This information is
> - used for optimizing purposes. In order to compile a kernel
> - that can run on all supported x86 CPU types (albeit not
> - optimally fast), you can specify "586" here.
> + Most x86-32 processor implementations are compatible with
> + the the CMOV instruction originally added in the Pentium Pro,
> + and they perform much better when using it.
> +
> + Disable this option to build for 586-class CPUs without this
> + instruction. This is only required for the original Intel
> + Pentium (P5, P54, P55), AMD K6/K6-II/K6-3D, Geode GX1 and Via
> + CyrixIII/C3 CPUs.
Very few users will know anything about CMOV.
I'd argue the right path forward is to just bite the bullet and remove
non-CMOV support as well, that would be the outcome *anyway* in a few
years. That would allow basically a single 'modern' 32-bit kernel that
is supposed to boot on every supported CPU. People might even end up
testing it ... ;-)
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists