linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iio: pressure: bmp280: drop sensor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250426162701.4dd1f282@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2025 16:27:01 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, Nuno Sá
 <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
 linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: pressure: bmp280: drop sensor_data array

On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 01:38:13 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 1:32 AM David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> wrote:
> > On 4/22/25 5:19 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:  
> > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 12:22 AM David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> wrote:  
> 
> ...
> 
> > > Ah, I meant the plural: of the supported sensors. Otherwise are you
> > > talking only about one sensor?
> > >  
> > "each type of the sensors" doesn't sound right to me either.
> >
> > I am talking about more than one type, not more than one sensor. Sensor just
> > describes what types I am talking about.
> >
> > So perhaps we could just avoid it with "each different sensor type".  
> 
> Okay, it might be my misunderstanding... Use the original one if you
> think it's better.
> 

I stuck to original text.  Applied.