linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 00/13] nommu UML

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m21pte6z73.wl-thehajime@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 12:49:36 +0900
From: Hajime Tazaki <thehajime@...il.com>
To: lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com
Cc: linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
	ricarkol@...gle.com,
	Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
	richard@....at,
	anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com,
	johannes@...solutions.net,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/13] nommu UML


Hello Lorenzo,

On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 22:49:31 +0900,
Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:

> It seemed this series died, which is a pity, i'd be very useful to have
> this functionality to aid in easily testing nommu in mm code.
> 
> I know that I pushed back a little (or rather - wondering about the status
> of nommu in general) back in v2, however with it confirmed that nommu is
> required, this series becomes really quite important.
> 
> This would need rebasing of course for a v8, but I wonder if there is any
> appetite for it or why this didn't go anywhere?
> 
> In any case, if you are still interested in this Hajime (thanks so much for
> all your hard work on it!), just saying there are definitely users out
> there.

I've been waiting for opinions from the um maintainers to the v7
patchset, and am ready to send v8 series with rebasing the current
uml/next branch.

I believe the v7 series is still in the patchwork queue so, I hope
it'll be reviewed soon.

# thanks for the information that this feature is useful to test mm
  code.

-- Hajime