linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/8] ublk: don't log uring_cmd cmd_op in ublk_dispatch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250427045803.772972-5-csander@purestorage.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2025 22:57:59 -0600
From: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Uday Shankar <ushankar@...estorage.com>,
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] ublk: don't log uring_cmd cmd_op in ublk_dispatch_req()

cmd_op is either UBLK_U_IO_FETCH_REQ, UBLK_U_IO_COMMIT_AND_FETCH_REQ,
or UBLK_U_IO_NEED_GET_DATA. Which one isn't particularly interesting
is already recorded by the log line in __ublk_ch_uring_cmd().

Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
---
 drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 4967a5d72029..01fc92051754 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -1159,12 +1159,12 @@ static void ublk_dispatch_req(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
 {
 	int tag = req->tag;
 	struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[tag];
 	unsigned int mapped_bytes;
 
-	pr_devel("%s: complete: op %d, qid %d tag %d io_flags %x addr %llx\n",
-			__func__, io->cmd->cmd_op, ubq->q_id, req->tag, io->flags,
+	pr_devel("%s: complete: qid %d tag %d io_flags %x addr %llx\n",
+			__func__, ubq->q_id, req->tag, io->flags,
 			ublk_get_iod(ubq, req->tag)->addr);
 
 	/*
 	 * Task is exiting if either:
 	 *
@@ -1185,13 +1185,12 @@ static void ublk_dispatch_req(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
 		 * so immediately pass UBLK_IO_RES_NEED_GET_DATA to ublksrv
 		 * and notify it.
 		 */
 		if (!(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_NEED_GET_DATA)) {
 			io->flags |= UBLK_IO_FLAG_NEED_GET_DATA;
-			pr_devel("%s: need get data. op %d, qid %d tag %d io_flags %x\n",
-					__func__, io->cmd->cmd_op, ubq->q_id,
-					req->tag, io->flags);
+			pr_devel("%s: need get data. qid %d tag %d io_flags %x\n",
+					__func__, ubq->q_id, req->tag, io->flags);
 			ublk_complete_io_cmd(io, UBLK_IO_RES_NEED_GET_DATA,
 					     issue_flags);
 			return;
 		}
 		/*
@@ -1200,12 +1199,12 @@ static void ublk_dispatch_req(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
 		 * do the copy work.
 		 */
 		io->flags &= ~UBLK_IO_FLAG_NEED_GET_DATA;
 		/* update iod->addr because ublksrv may have passed a new io buffer */
 		ublk_get_iod(ubq, req->tag)->addr = io->addr;
-		pr_devel("%s: update iod->addr: op %d, qid %d tag %d io_flags %x addr %llx\n",
-				__func__, io->cmd->cmd_op, ubq->q_id, req->tag, io->flags,
+		pr_devel("%s: update iod->addr: qid %d tag %d io_flags %x addr %llx\n",
+				__func__, ubq->q_id, req->tag, io->flags,
 				ublk_get_iod(ubq, req->tag)->addr);
 	}
 
 	mapped_bytes = ublk_map_io(ubq, req, io);
 
-- 
2.45.2