[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9793bfc7-5309-4e19-a0e4-5e298720aa9e@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:45:51 +0200
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>, Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/nouveau: Check dma_fence in canonical way
On 4/24/25 15:02, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> In nouveau_fence_done(), a fence is checked for being signaled by
> manually evaluating the base fence's bits. This can be done in a
> canonical manner through dma_fence_is_signaled().
>
> Replace the bit-check with dma_fence_is_signaled().
>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@...nel.org>
I think the bit check was used here as fast path optimization because we later call dma_fence_is_signaled() anyway.
Feel free to add my acked-by, but honestly what nouveau does here looks rather suspicious to me.
Regards,
Christian.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
> index fb9811938c82..d5654e26d5bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
> @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ nouveau_fence_done(struct nouveau_fence *fence)
> struct nouveau_channel *chan;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->base.flags))
> + if (dma_fence_is_signaled(&fence->base))
> return true;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&fctx->lock, flags);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists