lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA1CXcAiiBJ4mMp0WJUk7tWTF20guJi80P8wBh271yJ9P+c_VA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:47:15 -0600
From: Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, corbet@....net, rostedt@...dmis.org, 
	mhiramat@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, david@...hat.com, 
	baohua@...nel.org, ryan.roberts@....com, willy@...radead.org, 
	peterx@...hat.com, ziy@...dia.com, wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, 
	usamaarif642@...il.com, sunnanyong@...wei.com, vishal.moola@...il.com, 
	thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com, yang@...amperecomputing.com, 
	kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, aarcange@...hat.com, raquini@...hat.com, 
	dev.jain@....com, anshuman.khandual@....com, catalin.marinas@....com, 
	tiwai@...e.de, will@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, jack@...e.cz, 
	cl@...two.org, jglisse@...gle.com, surenb@...gle.com, zokeefe@...gle.com, 
	hannes@...xchg.org, rientjes@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, 
	rdunlap@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/12] khugepaged: introduce khugepaged_scan_bitmap for
 mTHP support

On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 8:52 PM Baolin Wang
<baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2025/4/17 08:02, Nico Pache wrote:
> > khugepaged scans PMD ranges for potential collapse to a hugepage. To add
> > mTHP support we use this scan to instead record chunks of utilized
> > sections of the PMD.
> >
> > khugepaged_scan_bitmap uses a stack struct to recursively scan a bitmap
> > that represents chunks of utilized regions. We can then determine what
> > mTHP size fits best and in the following patch, we set this bitmap while
> > scanning the PMD.
> >
> > max_ptes_none is used as a scale to determine how "full" an order must
> > be before being considered for collapse.
> >
> > When attempting to collapse an order that has its order set to "always"
> > lets always collapse to that order in a greedy manner without
> > considering the number of bits set.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >   include/linux/khugepaged.h |  4 ++
> >   mm/khugepaged.c            | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >   2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/khugepaged.h b/include/linux/khugepaged.h
> > index 1f46046080f5..18fe6eb5051d 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/khugepaged.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/khugepaged.h
> > @@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
> >   /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> >   #ifndef _LINUX_KHUGEPAGED_H
> >   #define _LINUX_KHUGEPAGED_H
> > +#define KHUGEPAGED_MIN_MTHP_ORDER    2
>
> Why is the minimum mTHP order set to 2? IMO, the file large folios can
> support order 1, so we don't expect to collapse exec file small folios
> to order 1 if possible?
I should have been more specific in the patch notes, but this affects
anonymous only. I'll go over my commit messages and make sure this is
reflected in the next version.
>
> (PS: I need more time to understand your logic in this patch, and any
> additional explanation would be helpful:) )

We are currently scanning ptes in a PMD. The core principle/reasoning
behind the bitmap is to keep the PMD scan while saving its state. We
then use this bitmap to determine which chunks of the PMD are active
and are the best candidates for mTHP collapse. We start at the PMD
level, and recursively break down the bitmap to find the appropriate
sizes for the bitmap.

looking at a simplified example: we scan a PMD and get the following
bitmap, 1111101101101011 (in this case MIN_MTHP_ORDER= 5, so each bit
== 32 ptes, in the actual set each bit == 4 ptes).
We would first attempt a PMD collapse, while checking the number of
bits set vs the max_ptes_none tunable. If those conditions arent
triggered, we will try the next enabled mTHP order, for each half of
the bitmap.

ie) order 8 attempt on 11111011 and order 8 attempt on 01101011.

If a collapse succeeds we dont keep recursing on that portion of the
bitmap. If not, we continue attempting lower orders.

Hopefully that helps you understand my logic here! Let me know if you
need more clarification.

I gave a presentation on this that might help too:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1w9NYLuC2kRcMAwhcashU1LWTfmI5TIZRaTWuZq-CHEg/edit?usp=sharing&resourcekey=0-nBAGld8cP1kW26XE6i0Bpg

Cheers,
-- Nico
>
> > +#define KHUGEPAGED_MIN_MTHP_NR       (1<<KHUGEPAGED_MIN_MTHP_ORDER)
> > +#define MAX_MTHP_BITMAP_SIZE  (1 << (ilog2(MAX_PTRS_PER_PTE) - KHUGEPAGED_MIN_MTHP_ORDER))
> > +#define MTHP_BITMAP_SIZE  (1 << (HPAGE_PMD_ORDER - KHUGEPAGED_MIN_MTHP_ORDER))
> >
> >   extern unsigned int khugepaged_max_ptes_none __read_mostly;
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> > diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> > index 5e9272ab82da..83230e9cdf3a 100644
> > --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> > +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> > @@ -94,6 +94,11 @@ static DEFINE_READ_MOSTLY_HASHTABLE(mm_slots_hash, MM_SLOTS_HASH_BITS);
> >
> >   static struct kmem_cache *mm_slot_cache __ro_after_init;
> >
> > +struct scan_bit_state {
> > +     u8 order;
> > +     u16 offset;
> > +};
> > +
> >   struct collapse_control {
> >       bool is_khugepaged;
> >
> > @@ -102,6 +107,18 @@ struct collapse_control {
> >
> >       /* nodemask for allocation fallback */
> >       nodemask_t alloc_nmask;
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * bitmap used to collapse mTHP sizes.
> > +      * 1bit = order KHUGEPAGED_MIN_MTHP_ORDER mTHP
> > +      */
> > +     DECLARE_BITMAP(mthp_bitmap, MAX_MTHP_BITMAP_SIZE);
> > +     DECLARE_BITMAP(mthp_bitmap_temp, MAX_MTHP_BITMAP_SIZE);
> > +     struct scan_bit_state mthp_bitmap_stack[MAX_MTHP_BITMAP_SIZE];
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct collapse_control khugepaged_collapse_control = {
> > +     .is_khugepaged = true,
> >   };
> >
> >   /**
> > @@ -851,10 +868,6 @@ static void khugepaged_alloc_sleep(void)
> >       remove_wait_queue(&khugepaged_wait, &wait);
> >   }
> >
> > -struct collapse_control khugepaged_collapse_control = {
> > -     .is_khugepaged = true,
> > -};
> > -
> >   static bool khugepaged_scan_abort(int nid, struct collapse_control *cc)
> >   {
> >       int i;
> > @@ -1118,7 +1131,8 @@ static int alloc_charge_folio(struct folio **foliop, struct mm_struct *mm,
> >
> >   static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
> >                             int referenced, int unmapped,
> > -                           struct collapse_control *cc)
> > +                           struct collapse_control *cc, bool *mmap_locked,
> > +                               u8 order, u16 offset)
> >   {
> >       LIST_HEAD(compound_pagelist);
> >       pmd_t *pmd, _pmd;
> > @@ -1137,8 +1151,12 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
> >        * The allocation can take potentially a long time if it involves
> >        * sync compaction, and we do not need to hold the mmap_lock during
> >        * that. We will recheck the vma after taking it again in write mode.
> > +      * If collapsing mTHPs we may have already released the read_lock.
> >        */
> > -     mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> > +     if (*mmap_locked) {
> > +             mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> > +             *mmap_locked = false;
> > +     }
> >
> >       result = alloc_charge_folio(&folio, mm, cc, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
> >       if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
> > @@ -1273,12 +1291,72 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
> >   out_up_write:
> >       mmap_write_unlock(mm);
> >   out_nolock:
> > +     *mmap_locked = false;
> >       if (folio)
> >               folio_put(folio);
> >       trace_mm_collapse_huge_page(mm, result == SCAN_SUCCEED, result);
> >       return result;
> >   }
> >
> > +// Recursive function to consume the bitmap
> > +static int khugepaged_scan_bitmap(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
> > +                     int referenced, int unmapped, struct collapse_control *cc,
> > +                     bool *mmap_locked, unsigned long enabled_orders)
> > +{
> > +     u8 order, next_order;
> > +     u16 offset, mid_offset;
> > +     int num_chunks;
> > +     int bits_set, threshold_bits;
> > +     int top = -1;
> > +     int collapsed = 0;
> > +     int ret;
> > +     struct scan_bit_state state;
> > +     bool is_pmd_only = (enabled_orders == (1 << HPAGE_PMD_ORDER));
> > +
> > +     cc->mthp_bitmap_stack[++top] = (struct scan_bit_state)
> > +             { HPAGE_PMD_ORDER - KHUGEPAGED_MIN_MTHP_ORDER, 0 };
> > +
> > +     while (top >= 0) {
> > +             state = cc->mthp_bitmap_stack[top--];
> > +             order = state.order + KHUGEPAGED_MIN_MTHP_ORDER;
> > +             offset = state.offset;
> > +             num_chunks = 1 << (state.order);
> > +             // Skip mTHP orders that are not enabled
> > +             if (!test_bit(order, &enabled_orders))
> > +                     goto next;
> > +
> > +             // copy the relavant section to a new bitmap
> > +             bitmap_shift_right(cc->mthp_bitmap_temp, cc->mthp_bitmap, offset,
> > +                               MTHP_BITMAP_SIZE);
> > +
> > +             bits_set = bitmap_weight(cc->mthp_bitmap_temp, num_chunks);
> > +             threshold_bits = (HPAGE_PMD_NR - khugepaged_max_ptes_none - 1)
> > +                             >> (HPAGE_PMD_ORDER - state.order);
> > +
> > +             //Check if the region is "almost full" based on the threshold
> > +             if (bits_set > threshold_bits || is_pmd_only
> > +                     || test_bit(order, &huge_anon_orders_always)) {
> > +                     ret = collapse_huge_page(mm, address, referenced, unmapped, cc,
> > +                                     mmap_locked, order, offset * KHUGEPAGED_MIN_MTHP_NR);
> > +                     if (ret == SCAN_SUCCEED) {
> > +                             collapsed += (1 << order);
> > +                             continue;
> > +                     }
> > +             }
> > +
> > +next:
> > +             if (state.order > 0) {
> > +                     next_order = state.order - 1;
> > +                     mid_offset = offset + (num_chunks / 2);
> > +                     cc->mthp_bitmap_stack[++top] = (struct scan_bit_state)
> > +                             { next_order, mid_offset };
> > +                     cc->mthp_bitmap_stack[++top] = (struct scan_bit_state)
> > +                             { next_order, offset };
> > +                     }
> > +     }
> > +     return collapsed;
> > +}
> > +
> >   static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >                                  struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >                                  unsigned long address, bool *mmap_locked,
> > @@ -1445,9 +1523,7 @@ static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >       pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);
> >       if (result == SCAN_SUCCEED) {
> >               result = collapse_huge_page(mm, address, referenced,
> > -                                         unmapped, cc);
> > -             /* collapse_huge_page will return with the mmap_lock released */
> > -             *mmap_locked = false;
> > +                                         unmapped, cc, mmap_locked, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER, 0);
> >       }
> >   out:
> >       trace_mm_khugepaged_scan_pmd(mm, &folio->page, writable, referenced,
>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ