[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b7adef4b-68ae-4a49-937b-307e116976f4@baylibre.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 10:16:07 -0500
From: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Nuno Sá
<nuno.sa@...log.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: ti-adc128s052: Drop variable vref
On 4/28/25 2:02 AM, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> According to Jonathan, variable reference voltages are very rare. It is
> unlikely it is needed, and supporting it makes the code a bit more
> complex.
>
> Simplify the driver and drop the variable vref support.
>
> Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
>
> ---
Reviewed-by: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
> @@ -183,17 +173,14 @@ static int adc128_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> indio_dev->channels = config->channels;
> indio_dev->num_channels = config->num_channels;
>
> - adc->reg = devm_regulator_get(&spi->dev, config->refname);
> - if (IS_ERR(adc->reg))
> - return PTR_ERR(adc->reg);
> -
> - ret = regulator_enable(adc->reg);
> + ret = devm_regulator_get_enable_read_voltage(&spi->dev,
> + config->refname);
Is this properly aligned to the opening "("?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists