linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v18 1/2] ACPI: APEI: send SIGBUS to current task if synchronous memory error not recovered

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250428152350.GA23615@willie-the-truck>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:23:51 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	rafael@...nel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org, justin.he@....com, ardb@...nel.org,
	ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com, ashish.kalra@....com,
	baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, lenb@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
	robert.moore@...el.com, lvying6@...wei.com, xiexiuqi@...wei.com,
	zhuo.song@...ux.alibaba.com, sudeep.holla@....com,
	lpieralisi@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	yazen.ghannam@....com, mark.rutland@....com, mingo@...hat.com,
	robin.murphy@....com, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, bp@...en8.de,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com,
	tanxiaofei@...wei.com, mawupeng1@...wei.com, linmiaohe@...wei.com,
	naoya.horiguchi@....com, james.morse@....com,
	tongtiangen@...wei.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	jarkko@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v18 1/2] ACPI: APEI: send SIGBUS to current task
 if synchronous memory error not recovered

On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 09:10:09AM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:
> 在 2025/4/25 09:00, Hanjun Guo 写道:
> > Call force_sig(SIGBUS) directly in ghes_do_proc() is not my favourite,
> > but I can bear that, please add
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Hanjun
> 
> Thanks. Hanjun.
> 
> @Rafael, @Catalin,
> 
> Both patch 1 and 2 have reviewed-by tag from the arm64 ACPI maintainers, Hanjun,
> now. Are you happpy to pick and queue this patch set to acpi tree or arm tree?

Since this primarily touches drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c, I think it should
go via the ACPI tree and not the arm64 one.

Will