[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250428172516.79058e22@booty>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 17:25:16 +0200
From: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Thomas Zimmermann
<tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter
<simona@...ll.ch>, Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, Neil Armstrong
<neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Laurent
Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, Jonas Karlman
<jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, Jagan Teki
<jagan@...rulasolutions.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer
<s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Douglas Anderson
<dianders@...omium.org>, Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>, Krzysztof
Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Anusha Srivatsa <asrivats@...hat.com>, Paul
Kocialkowski <paulk@...-base.io>, Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>, Hui
Pu <Hui.Pu@...ealthcare.com>, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
asahi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 34/34] drm/bridge: panel: convert to
devm_drm_bridge_alloc() API
Hi Maxime,
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 13:39:23 +0200
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 10:05:49PM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> > This is the new API for allocating DRM bridges.
> >
> > The devm lifetime management of this driver is peculiar. The underlying
> > device for the panel_bridge is the panel, and the devm lifetime is tied the
> > panel device (panel->dev). However the panel_bridge allocation is not
> > performed by the panel driver, but rather by a separate entity (typically
> > the previous bridge in the encoder chain).
> >
> > Thus when that separate entoty is destroyed, the panel_bridge is not
> > removed automatically by devm, so it is rather done explicitly by calling
> > drm_panel_bridge_remove(). This is the function that does devm_kfree() the
> > panel_bridge in current code, so update it as well to put the bridge
> > reference instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
>
> This looks fine, but we need a TODO entry to clean this up later on, and
> a comment on devm_drm_put_bridge that this is inherently unsafe and
> must not be used.
Ah, I see, OK.
Quick draft:
/**
* devm_drm_put_bridge - Release a bridge reference obtained via devm
* @dev: device that got the bridge via devm
* @bridge: pointer to a struct drm_bridge obtained via devm
*
* Same as drm_bridge_put() for bridge pointers obtained via devm functions
* such as devm_drm_bridge_alloc().
+ *
+ * This function is a temporary workaround and MUST NOT be used. Manual
+ * handling of bridge lifetime is inherently unsafe.
*/
and:
- devm_kfree(panel_bridge->panel->dev, bridge);
+ /* TODO remove this after reworking panel_bridge lifetime */
+ devm_drm_put_bridge(panel_bridge->panel->dev, bridge);
}
Does it look good enough?
Luca
--
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists