[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aA/EoEFtbnL2+zAw@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 11:10:40 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <jgg@...dia.com>, <kevin.tian@...el.com>, <corbet@....net>,
<will@...nel.org>, <bagasdotme@...il.com>, <robin.murphy@....com>,
<joro@...tes.org>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>, <vdumpa@...dia.com>,
<jonathanh@...dia.com>, <shuah@...nel.org>, <jsnitsel@...hat.com>,
<nathan@...nel.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>, <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
<mshavit@...gle.com>, <praan@...gle.com>, <zhangzekun11@...wei.com>,
<iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
<patches@...ts.linux.dev>, <mochs@...dia.com>, <alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com>,
<vasant.hegde@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/22] iommufd/viommu: Introduce IOMMUFD_OBJ_VCMDQ and
its related struct
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 09:09:19AM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 4/26/25 13:58, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > Add a new IOMMUFD_OBJ_VCMDQ with an iommufd_vcmdq structure, representing
> > a command queue type of physical HW passed to a user space VM. This vCMDQ
> > object, is a subset of vIOMMU resources of a physical IOMMU's, such as:
> > - NVIDIA's virtual command queue
> > - AMD vIOMMU's command buffer
> >
> > Inroduce a struct iommufd_vcmdq and its allocator iommufd_vcmdq_alloc().
> > Also add a pair of viommu ops for iommufd to forward user space ioctls to
> > IOMMU drivers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen<nicolinc@...dia.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
>
> with a small nit below ...
>
> > ---
> > include/linux/iommufd.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/iommufd.h b/include/linux/iommufd.h
> > index ef0d3c4765cf..e91381aaec5a 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/iommufd.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/iommufd.h
> > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ enum iommufd_object_type {
> > IOMMUFD_OBJ_VIOMMU,
> > IOMMUFD_OBJ_VDEVICE,
> > IOMMUFD_OBJ_VEVENTQ,
> > + IOMMUFD_OBJ_VCMDQ,
> > #ifdef CONFIG_IOMMUFD_TEST
> > IOMMUFD_OBJ_SELFTEST,
> > #endif
> > @@ -112,6 +113,14 @@ struct iommufd_vdevice {
> > u64 id; /* per-vIOMMU virtual ID */
> > };
> > +struct iommufd_vcmdq {
> > + struct iommufd_object obj;
> > + struct iommufd_ctx *ictx;
> > + struct iommufd_viommu *viommu;
> > + dma_addr_t addr;
>
> It's better to add a comment to state that @addr is a guest physical
> address. Or not?
Yea. Let's add one:
dma_addr_t addr; /* in guest physical address space */
Thanks
Nicolin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists