lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <174586811655.22196.14930925796793997721.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:21:56 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Eric Biggers" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>, "Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@...en8.de>,
 x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/microcode] x86/microcode/AMD: Use sha256() instead of
 init/update/final

The following commit has been merged into the x86/microcode branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     c0a62eadb6fd158e4d6d4d47d806109e7ae32e8b
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/c0a62eadb6fd158e4d6d4d47d806109e7ae32e8b
Author:        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
AuthorDate:    Mon, 28 Apr 2025 11:30:06 -07:00
Committer:     Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@...en8.de>
CommitterDate: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 21:03:58 +02:00

x86/microcode/AMD: Use sha256() instead of init/update/final

Just call sha256() instead of doing the init/update/final sequence.

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@...en8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250428183006.782501-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
index 57bd61f..b2bbfc4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
@@ -211,7 +211,6 @@ static bool verify_sha256_digest(u32 patch_id, u32 cur_rev, const u8 *data, unsi
 {
 	struct patch_digest *pd = NULL;
 	u8 digest[SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE];
-	struct sha256_state s;
 	int i;
 
 	if (x86_family(bsp_cpuid_1_eax) < 0x17 ||
@@ -230,9 +229,7 @@ static bool verify_sha256_digest(u32 patch_id, u32 cur_rev, const u8 *data, unsi
 		return false;
 	}
 
-	sha256_init(&s);
-	sha256_update(&s, data, len);
-	sha256_final(&s, digest);
+	sha256(data, len, digest);
 
 	if (memcmp(digest, pd->sha256, sizeof(digest))) {
 		pr_err("Patch 0x%x SHA256 digest mismatch!\n", patch_id);

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ