linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] mm/hugetlb: Let unmap_hugepage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aA_Z9R-vffyuwNyV@debian>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:41:41 -0700
From: Fan Ni <nifan.cxl@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: nifan.cxl@...il.com, muchun.song@...ux.dev, willy@...radead.org,
	mcgrof@...nel.org, a.manzanares@...sung.com, dave@...olabs.net,
	david@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] mm/hugetlb: Let unmap_hugepage_range() and

On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 12:31:43PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 10:11:43 -0700 nifan.cxl@...il.com wrote:
> 
> > Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] mm/hugetlb: Let unmap_hugepage_range() and
> 
> What was intended here?

Since I have changes in each patch in this series, I thought it may be
better to have a cover letter to summarize all the changes in one place.

Should I just mention the changes in each patch separately?

Fan