[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d79790e5-52c9-4135-8f3c-af797145fa2d@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 23:14:18 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
neil.armstrong@...aro.org
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8650: add iris DT node
On 4/28/25 12:48 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 at 11:18, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 25/04/2025 23:49, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 4/24/25 6:32 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>>> Add DT entries for the sm8650 iris decoder.
>>>>
>>>> Since the firmware is required to be signed, only enable
>>>> on Qualcomm development boards where the firmware is
>>>> available.
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>> - removed useless firmware-name
>>>> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250418-topic-sm8x50-upstream-iris-8650-dt-v1-1-80a6ae50bf10@linaro.org
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> + iris: video-codec@...0000 {
>>>> + compatible = "qcom,sm8650-iris";
>>>> + reg = <0 0x0aa00000 0 0xf0000>;
>>>> +
>>>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 174 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
>>>> +
>>>> + power-domains = <&videocc VIDEO_CC_MVS0C_GDSC>,
>>>> + <&videocc VIDEO_CC_MVS0_GDSC>,
>>>> + <&rpmhpd RPMHPD_MXC>,
>>>> + <&rpmhpd RPMHPD_MMCX>;
>>>> + power-domain-names = "venus",
>>>> + "vcodec0",
>>>> + "mxc",
>>>> + "mmcx";
>>>> +
>>>> + operating-points-v2 = <&iris_opp_table>;
>>>> +
>>>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_VIDEO_AXI0_CLK>,
>>>> + <&videocc VIDEO_CC_MVS0C_CLK>,
>>>> + <&videocc VIDEO_CC_MVS0_CLK>;
>>>> + clock-names = "iface",
>>>> + "core",
>>>> + "vcodec0_core";
>>>> +
>>>> + interconnects = <&gem_noc MASTER_APPSS_PROC QCOM_ICC_TAG_ACTIVE_ONLY
>>>> + &config_noc SLAVE_VENUS_CFG QCOM_ICC_TAG_ACTIVE_ONLY>,
>>>> + <&mmss_noc MASTER_VIDEO QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS
>>>> + &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>;
>>>> + interconnect-names = "cpu-cfg",
>>>> + "video-mem";
>>>> +
>>>> + /* FW load region */
>>>
>>> I don't think this comment brings value
>>
>> Right
>>
>>>
>>>> + memory-region = <&video_mem>;
>>>> +
>>>> + resets = <&gcc GCC_VIDEO_AXI0_CLK_ARES>,
>>>> + <&videocc VIDEO_CC_XO_CLK_ARES>,
>>>> + <&videocc VIDEO_CC_MVS0C_CLK_ARES>;
>>>> + reset-names = "bus",
>>>> + "xo",
>>>> + "core";
>>>> +
>>>> + iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x1940 0>,
>>>> + <&apps_smmu 0x1947 0>;
>>>
>>> I think you may also need 0x1942 0x0 (please also make the second value / SMR
>>> mask hex)> +
>>
>> I don't see 0x1942 in the downstream DT, and which mask should I set ? 0x1 ?
I saw it in docs only, maybe Vikash or Dikshita can chime in whether it's
necessary. It would have mask 0x0 if so.
>>
>>>> + dma-coherent;
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * IRIS firmware is signed by vendors, only
>>>> + * enable in boards where the proper signed firmware
>>>> + * is available.
>>>> + */
>>>
>>> Here's to another angry media article :(
>>>
>>> Please keep Iris enabled.. Vikash reassured me this is not an
>>> issue until the user attempts to use the decoder [1], and reading
>>> the code myself I come to the same conclusion (though I haven't given
>>> it a smoke test - please do that yourself, as you seem to have a better
>>> set up with these platforms).
>>>
>>> If the userland is sane, it should throw an error and defer to CPU
>>> decoding.
>>>
>>> This is >>unlike venus<< which if lacking firmware at probe (i.e. boot)
>>> would prevent .sync_state
>>
>> Well sync with Bjorn who asked me to only enable on board with available firmware ;-)
>
> I'd second him here: if there is no firmware, don't enable the device.
> It's better than the users having cryptic messages in the dmesg,
> trying to understand why the driver errors out.
I don't agree.. the firmware may appear later at boot (e.g. user installs a
small rootfs and manually pulls in linux-firmware). Plus without the firmware,
we can still power on and off the IP block, particularly achieve sync_state
regardless of it
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists